Payment Capturing Stylized Movement with Dynamic Poses [COLOSO, Storyboard Artist, SolKorra]

A list of currently running Group Buy campaigns that you can join

Capturing Stylized Movement with Dynamic Poses [COLOSO, Storyboard Artist, SolKorra]

Thats how many people needed to sign up for the primary list to push it to the payment stage.

The bar represents how many people from either lists actually paid.
Exactly, but once again there's a lot of inconsistency. The payment bar hasn't moved for several days and it's not complete. So, in principle, if the payment bar is not full, the course payment should not have been made (since the necessary funds were not available). However, the administrators confirmed on telegram that payment for the course had indeed been made (even though the number of participants who had paid was not complete). So maybe they made up the shortfall with the excess they got from another course, for another group buy ? Or is there a bug, the payment bar is actually complete and the 10 members paid ?

What's more, I noticed that several members have reported having this course for several days now (on OCC and on telegram). So I thought that logically, the admins would cancel this course (if they ever got it from a member).

It's all just complicated. Nothing makes sense and I sincerely feel sorry that the course has been leaked, while here we still have nothing. No explanation, no apology, absolutely nothing. This lack of transparency... It's really sad.
 
We are not responsible for any leaks.

Regarding, the long waiting period, Strawberry will make an announcement on OCC to attract more users to this GB
Ok. So may I interpreter as 'The course will go on and you will deliver this course, regarding this already being leaked. shared among people in telegram? and deliver gbc version.'

I think this incident. should be address as concern/adding the rule about it. Because it will cause conflict in future.

Also should the organizer buy the product after product payment complete? Why i get the info this product already download and dubbed?
Well tbh this Gbc is already good as dead. People won't fund money to leaked coursed. They better off fund another course.

I feel People who paid first and fast being punished because of this. While people with sign up and not follow through payment get away for this incident.
So what I propose is:
-Creating rule if the course already leaked and how to processed it
1) If the organizer don't buy course yet, give the fund back
2) if the organizer buy the product and already leaked. Provide the recipt of product to people. People who payed don't get the money back.

Suggestion for this case:
1) Provide recipt for us, (proof if you brought the course already). People will be better accepting this accident
2) I need clarification of this because this shouldn't happen if organizer buy the product if the product payment complete.( For now on I think it's better to buy if product payment complete)
 
My main concern is that the admins could clearly foresee that this course would be leaked. Because when a member said he had the course on OCC, strawberry didn't hesitate to ask him to share it. Why ask him to share it if you've already paid for it? So logically, on August 24, you hadn't yet paid for it.

If there was an ounce of honesty and respect towards us, the group buy should have been on pause from the moment that member on OCC said he had the course (and you should never have bought it, if you really did).

Now, you're telling us that this course has already been paid on telegram, that you're not responsible, blah, blah... But just by doing some simple research, your speech doesn't hold water. I don't know what you admins are trying to do... But this really isn't right and proper.

We sincerely believed in GBC's potential and we really wanted to commit ourselves to its success. Except that in the end, we're faced with a whole bunch of contradictions on your part.
 
My main concern is that the admins could clearly foresee that this course would be leaked. Because when a member said he had the course on OCC, strawberry didn't hesitate to ask him to share it. Why ask him to share it if you've already paid for it? So logically, on August 24, you hadn't yet paid for it.

If there was an ounce of honesty and respect towards us, the group buy should have been on pause from the moment that member on OCC said he had the course (and you should never have bought it, if you really did).

Now, you're telling us that this course has already been paid on telegram, that you're not responsible, blah, blah... But just by doing some simple research, your speech doesn't hold water. I don't know what you admins are trying to do... But this really isn't right and proper.

We sincerely believed in GBC's potential and we really wanted to commit ourselves to its success. Except that in the end, we're faced with a whole bunch of contradictions on your part.
I think try to give admin some time to think and reply. You already give your point. They're just two peoples afterall.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Manuel
Yes, but I wanted to complete what I was saying before (because my answers lacked clarity in the heat of the moment). It's one thing for them to be only two people, but that doesn't excuse what's happening now. People have been asking for transparency for days and days. Now we're asking for explanations about the leaks, we don't even have an excuse except "we're not responsible". It's honestly sad what's going on.
Hello, could you kindly clarify what you mean by "excuse"? I would like to point out that the policy of GBC does not state that credits will be refunded in case of leaks. This is a straightforward idea and I am unsure why it is difficult to comprehend. If you purchase an authentic course from the official website and it is later leaked at a lower price, would you expect a refund?
 
  • Angry
Reactions: Fraise melba
Hello, could you kindly clarify what you mean by "excuse"? I would like to point out that the policy of GBC does not state that credits will be refunded in case of leaks. This is a straightforward idea and I am unsure why it is difficult to comprehend. If you purchase an authentic course from the official website and it is later leaked at a lower price, would you expect a refund?
The problem people thought you get the course with leak and don't have real course yet.
 
Hi, we already have this course, from a user that provides us with most of Coloso courses. And as I remember it was dubbed. Since 8/10 have paid the participant fee, Strawberry will post it soon.
 
Hi, we already have this course, from a user that provides us with most of Coloso courses. And as I remember it was dubbed. Since 8/10 have paid the participant fee, Strawberry will post it soon.
Ok I asked this to prevent future conflict: it can be happened again.
1) Any chance another future course leaked in product payment but the organizer don’t buy course yet. Would you willing as gbc admin approve to refund the course? Since the fund to buy it will be unused. Only buy the product if the product payment complete.

2) If you brought the course from another member. (First make gb introduction if it’s not refundable, otherwise organizer need to refund if the product payment period not completed, yet get leaked. If organizer already give the warning, yet it leaked. Member not get the money back.
 
Ok I asked this to prevent future conflict: it can be happened again.
1) Any chance another future course leaked in product payment but the organizer don’t buy course yet. Would you willing as gbc admin approve to refund the course? Since the fund to buy it will be unused. Only buy the product if the product payment complete.

2) If you brought the course from another member. (First make gb introduction if it’s not refundable, otherwise organizer need to refund if the product payment period not completed, yet get leaked. If organizer already give the warning, yet it leaked. Member not get the money back.
I apologize, but I am still unclear on your message. To clarify, we cannot offer refunds for any leaked courses. This is not within our responsibility, as we do not have the resources to handle such situations. As an example, even course publishers would not offer refunds for leaked courses. I hope this explanation is helpful and clear for everyone.
 
I apologize, but I am still unclear on your message. To clarify, we cannot offer refunds for any leaked courses. This is not within our responsibility, as we do not have the resources to handle such situations. As an example, even course publishers would not offer refunds for leaked courses. I hope this explanation is helpful and clear for everyone.
If the course is leaked, users should inform each other in a GB thread thread to avoid spending their money. That's it. We literally have no time for this
 
If the course is leaked, users should inform each other in a GB thread thread to avoid spending their money. That's it. We literally have no time for this
Ok i just need answer for this question. Say the course is leaked but the organizer don't buy/use fund for course yet. Then are you still not gonna refund in case those happened?
 
  • Like
Reactions: elon
Owl, you do realize that what you are saying makes no sense and that there is a crying lack of information on your part?
hello Guys, you're both pretty). Whitetiger, Owl clearly has stated that he got the course on his harddrive. Your statement here is invalid.

First of all, there hasn't been the announcement you posted on other groups buys: in other words, nobody knows that you're getting this course from a user. So, most people assume that you get the videos yourself, with your own Coloso account, at least for this GB, since there's no announcement anywhere that you got it from a member. There was no 50% off either. The price of the course was $102, with the 30% discount for being a new Coloso user (Coloso offers several deals for new user).
You are the person who posted this thread, and you are the one who set the GB price. Owl is an admin and he is seeking the best and the most productive way to obtain the content. Owl has notified you immediately that he has this course on hand.

Lastly, people want to see proof of purchase. Did you pay the user with money from this GB? If so, how much and can we have proof of purchase (invoice or e-mail proving that you sent him the money). If there's no proof :
I have transferred the money to the user who owned this course. I will ask the "Coloso master" to step into this thread and confirm if this is true.

- At least offer a solution or compensation to members who have paid. As I said, there were plenty of points that showed it was foreseeable that the course would be leaked. It's your role to potentially see these things coming and this could be seen from the fact that for several days, a few members had been saying they already had this course (and 1 of them wanted to share it for free).
- Refund GBC credits to members who have paid.
I have paid for the course already, who will compensate me? :ROFLMAO:
My role here is to provide the community with a platform to purchase high-quality courses collaboratively without being scammed. This has been done without issues so far...
There was one user who wanted to share his account details, for us to download it. We declined his offer, since "Colos master" already got this course and dubbed in English.

Owl has stated clearly, that leaks won't be compensated or refunded. Refund for a stolen course, are you serious?
We already face a lot of difficulties in implementing Clear and Straightforward Payment solutions to GBC (PayPal), and you are talking about refunds?!
 
  • Angry
Reactions: elon
please owl be reasonable you're the organizer of the GB, you can't just walk away like that

with everything that's been announced, it's clear that you could have seen that the course was going to be leaked since one of the admins asked a member to share the course, it was your responsibility to inform the members and ask them whether or not the group buy should continue

did you pay for for the course or get it for free?

plus it's funny, because the leaked version is dubbed too so the leaked version is actually the same 🙁
I do recommend you guys, to reframe creating alt accounts to support your claims with the evidence. This will end up that I will just expel you from our community. I don't have time for all of these debates. Thank you for understanding
 
  • Angry
Reactions: elon
Hi @strawberry can you fix this
Open photo
1695000907373.png